Can Minnesota’s integration program spawn innovation for our K12 schools, making them what we need for the new age of globalization?
Minnesota’s 2011 legislative session resulted in an agreement with the Governor to “re-purpose” the state’s integration revenue, which are used to support efforts to racially integrate schools. This followed an attempt to eliminate the integration rule altogether and restrict the funds to literacy programs. A task force (on which I sit) was created to develop recommendations for future use of the $100 million currently allotted for integration plans.
I am opposed to retreating from the morally and legally correct effort to prevent racial segregation in public schools. Prior to the Brown v. Board U.S. Supreme Court decision, school segregation was used to perpetuate race based inequalities and discrimination. Minnesota has an opportunity to revolutionize policy and become a world leader in education.
Critics of the current program are correct to point out that the program is not currently a good fit. Our classrooms are increasingly diverse but academic achievement rates of students of color continue to lag far behind those of white students.
Defenders are also correct: a school system built on racial segregation is bad for society. It weakens academic outcomes, and destroys underfunded schools where poverty and race intersect. It leaves all students – even white students –without the ability to develop an aptitude for thriving in our multiracial, multicultural world.
Our integration program is not being held accountable for these outcomes, and so it must change. But meaningful change demands more than mandating classroom diversity – as important as that legal compelling interest is for the state.
Minnesota schools must help students develop the skills to operate powerfully in the new era of globalization. Our current third graders will need to negotiate with their Chinese, Brazilian, German, South African and Indian peers in finance, manufacturing, bio-engineering, food and green energy production; failure means sacrificing prosperity and Minnesota’s global potential.
If our students cannot appreciate diversity at home, they certainly will not be able to navigate a planet full of different races, languages and belief systems.
Minnesota’s integration program shouldn’t be about funding another literacy intervention. Instead it offers us a way to commit to developing global-era skills: multicultural communications, unique problem solving techniques, and use of technology to promote digital creativity. We should create racially and culturally integrated learning environments so students can practice these skills. Such exciting dynamics will drive greater achievement of our present academic standards.
Minnesota smartly created the Integration Revenue program years ago, but we’ve outgrown the program and academic achievement and our potential is suffering. It’s time to update it.
